feat: use go.uber.org/mock instead of github.com/golang/mock

[ifplusor]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem Summary

What is changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 477 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ee76217) 57.07% compared to head (1d0bad2) 51.31%.
Report is 107 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #645      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.07%   51.31%   -5.76%     
==========================================
  Files         190      260      +70     
  Lines       15191    19566    +4375     
==========================================
+ Hits         8670    10041    +1371     
- Misses       5884     8706    +2822     
- Partials      637      819     +182     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	51.31% <3.63%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
api/errors/app.go	30.90% <ø> (ø)
lib/bytes/clone_go119.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
lib/bytes/escape.go	54.46% <ø> (ø)
lib/bytes/io.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
lib/bytes/parse.go	7.14% <ø> (ø)
lib/bytes/unsafe.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
lib/bytes/utf8.go	11.11% <ø> (ø)
lib/json/path/parse.go	49.41% <ø> (ø)
lib/json/path/path.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
lib/json/path/segment.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 31 more

... and 393 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 00d9a94...1d0bad2. Read the comment docs.