Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix link to wrong Portal #107

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion posts/decentralization.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ However, this arguments relies on dependence on a small number of large actors.

</center><br>

For a long time, this work has been on the backburner; [Portal Network](https://www.portal.network/#/) exists, but realistically it has not gotten the level of attention commensurate with its importance in Ethereum's future. Fortunately, there is now strong interest in momentum toward putting far more resources into a minimized version of Portal that focuses on distributed storage, and accessibility, of history. This momentum should be built on, and we should make a concerted effort to implement EIP-4444 soon, paired with a robust decentralized peer-to-peer network for storing and retrieving old history.
For a long time, this work has been on the backburner; [Portal Network](https://www.ethportal.net/) exists, but realistically it has not gotten the level of attention commensurate with its importance in Ethereum's future. Fortunately, there is now strong interest in momentum toward putting far more resources into a minimized version of Portal that focuses on distributed storage, and accessibility, of history. This momentum should be built on, and we should make a concerted effort to implement EIP-4444 soon, paired with a robust decentralized peer-to-peer network for storing and retrieving old history.


For state and ZK-EVMs, this kind of distributed approach is harder. To build an efficient block, you simply have to have the full state. In this case, I personally favor a pragmatic approach: **we define, and stick to, some level of hardware requirements needed to have a "node that does everything", which is higher than the (ideally ever-decreasing) cost of simply validating the chain, but still low enough to be affordable to hobbyists.** We rely on a 1-of-N assumption, where we ensure that the N is quite large. For example, this could be a high-end consumer laptop.
Expand Down