Fix bucket naming clashes for cloudscale and exoscale #206
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
If a nested services needed more than one bucket, the provisioning would fail. That's because the bucket CRs for cloudscale and exoscale patched value of the
crossplane.io/composite
label to themetadata.name
of the resulting objects. As this will always be the name of the top most composite, there were name clashes.This change is implemented in a backward compatible fashion. If there are already existing CRs, it will simply take their name. If the CRs are freshly created, the new naming will be used.
Also the naming follows what has been implement for the minio buckets. It takes the value of the
bucketName
as the name of the CRs. As bucket names should be unique per provider anyway.Checklist
bug
,enhancement
,documentation
,change
,breaking
,dependency
as they show up in the changelog