Move DID Parameters section from did-core to did-resolution. #106
Conversation
peacekeeper
requested review from
dmitrizagidulin,
mccown,
ChristopherA and
danpape
as code owners
|
This was discussed during the #did meeting on 19 December 2024. View the transcriptw3c/did-core#872 and this w3c/did-resolution#106markus_sabadello: I created a PR in did-core and a corresponding PR in did-resolution to move the parameters section from did-core to did-resolution, <Wip> This w3c/did-core#872 and this w3c/did-resolution#106 |
| A resource hash of the <a>DID document</a> to add integrity protection, as | ||
| specified in [[?HASHLINK]]. This parameter is non-normative. | ||
| If present, the associated value MUST be an | ||
| <a data-lt="ascii string">ASCII string</a>. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not for this PR, but I wonder if we should just define hashlinks in this spec given that we have Multihash defined in CID now?
|
This was discussed during the #did meeting on 09 January 2025. View the transcriptw3c/did-resolution#106markus_sabadello: I think this would be ready to merge. There haven't been a lot of reviews but this is something we decided to do before the holidays. wip: I don't know what's best. I can provide a review, and I have reviewed some. manu: Manual reviews by just adding people would work for now. There may be a way to automate through the code owners file, but it may be an abuse of that file. markus_sabadello: For now, I'll add people manually. |
|
Merging after multiple approvals. |
This adds the "DID Parameters" section to did-resolution. Also see the "matching" PR in did-core: w3c/did-core#872
Preview | Diff