Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix for compound triples in reified triples #70

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

Fix for compound triples in reified triples #70

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

afs
Copy link
Contributor

@afs afs commented Sep 16, 2024 •
edited by pr-preview bot
Loading

This resolves #71.

Restrict reified triples syntax to only have terms, and not compound triple forms.

Preview | Diff

@afs afs mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2024
Closed
@afs afs added the spec:bug Bug in the specification label Sep 16, 2024
@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

This will also need some corresponding changes to the Parsing section.

@afs
Copy link
Contributor Author

afs commented Sep 16, 2024

Thanks for regenerating the HTML.

@gkellogg gkellogg mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2024
Merged
@afs afs requested a review from gkellogg September 19, 2024 22:34
@gkellogg gkellogg merged commit 9f7284a into main Sep 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@gkellogg gkellogg deleted the rt-compound-triples branch September 30, 2024 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@domel domel domel approved these changes

@gkellogg gkellogg gkellogg approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec:bug Bug in the specification
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reified triples and compound triple form syntax.
3 participants
@afs @gkellogg @domel