Fixes #9: Better wheel implementation provides 4x speedup #11
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[Fixes #9]
This PR includes the changes to the
Wheel
type that I recommended in issue #9.The graphs below show the performance of the
Sieve
andTrialDivision
prime generators. No changes have been made toTrialDivision
, so the green line in all of these graphs is the same.First, here is the performance of the prime generators without the changes I'm recommending. Notice that the line for
Sieve
is well above the line forTrialDivision
(lower is better). In fact,TrialDivision
is usually twice as fast asSieve
.Just by implementing the
peek_mut()
optimization I suggested in issue #9, we double the speed ofSieve
. It's now slightly faster thanTrialDivision
no matter the input size.Then, using the improved
Wheel
implementation, we get another doubling. TheSieve
is now much faster thanTrialDivision
for all input sizes.