Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #1245 from Zarquan/20231120-zrq-rsap-update
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Notes from the RSAP process
  • Loading branch information
Zarquan authored Jan 5, 2024
2 parents aa68c60 + 766aa5e commit c5f9b24
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 6 changed files with 508 additions and 0 deletions.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
71 changes: 71 additions & 0 deletions notes/zrq/20231120-01-rsap-update.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
#
# <meta:header>
# <meta:licence>
# Copyright (c) 2023, ROE (http://www.roe.ac.uk/)
#
# This information is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This information is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# </meta:licence>
# </meta:header>
#
#zrq-notes-time
#zrq-notes-indent
#zrq-notes-crypto
#zrq-notes-ansible
#zrq-notes-osformat
#zrq-notes-zeppelin
#

Target:

Update our RSAP request following comments from Deniza Chekrygina at STFC UKRI.

Result:

Work in progress ...

# -----------------------------------------------------

Thank you for submitting a resource request to IRIS for the allocation round for 2024/25. It contains almost all the requested information concerning your future hardware needs. However, I have some comments:

1. There is a bit of a mismatch of information provided for the GAIA Core Processing (CP) and GAIA Data Mining (DM) platform.
For example, for CP 3.1.1A it says allocated, while in 3.1.2A for DM –provided.
For storage for the former, it says TB; for the latter, it says TiB.
For the CPU CP uses physical cores, and DM uses virtual cores.
This can be a bit confusing for reviewers to follow.

2. In the table in 4.1.2, can you please specify if the RAM for each core or for all cores is shown in the CPU column?

3. In section 5 you are writing that the request is for additional resources;
however, in 5.1 mention reducing your request from the currently allocated.
Can you please clarify?
Having read 5.1, I assume that the numbers in Table 5.1A are for the total request.

4. I might have missed it, but I couldn’t find anything discussing DM requests at different providers.
There is some mention of storage for DR4 but not the CPU request.
Perhaps some information can be added to the computation model section of the document?

5. Can you please confirm that in 5.2 you are requesting 2800 virtual cores in total
and not in addition to the current 700 virtual cores?
Your long-term forecast shows 2800 virtual cores as a total request for DM for the next three years.

# -----------------------------------------------------

How do we check to see if we should use TB or TiB ?

Compare what Openstack metadata says compared to actual disc space.





Loading

0 comments on commit c5f9b24

Please sign in to comment.