Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix for artifacts coming from a different artifact store #2928

Merged

Conversation

bcdurak
Copy link
Contributor

@bcdurak bcdurak commented Aug 11, 2024

Describe changes

I implemented a bugfix for loading artifacts from a different artifact store than the active artifact store.

Pre-requisites

Please ensure you have done the following:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
  • If my change requires a change to docs, I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have based my new branch on develop and the open PR is targeting develop. If your branch wasn't based on develop read Contribution guide on rebasing branch to develop.
  • If my changes require changes to the dashboard, these changes are communicated/requested.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Other (add details above)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 11, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added internal To filter out internal PRs and issues bug Something isn't working labels Aug 11, 2024
src/zenml/orchestrators/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/zenml/orchestrators/step_runner.py Show resolved Hide resolved
src/zenml/artifacts/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/zenml/orchestrators/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/zenml/orchestrators/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/zenml/orchestrators/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/zenml/orchestrators/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/zenml/orchestrators/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/zenml/orchestrators/utils.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@bcdurak bcdurak changed the base branch from main to develop August 21, 2024 15:24
Copy link
Contributor

@avishniakov avishniakov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we cannot release it without a single test case. @bcdurak can you come up with some where the stack switch happens to validate that it is working as expected?

Copy link
Contributor

@schustmi schustmi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the test doesn't really cover what it should, but if you think a real test is too complicated i'm okay with it

@bcdurak bcdurak merged commit 8b8a6af into develop Aug 27, 2024
71 checks passed
@bcdurak bcdurak deleted the bugfix/PRD-495-fixing-artifact-load-from-other-artifact-store branch August 27, 2024 15:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working internal To filter out internal PRs and issues run-slow-ci
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants