Adding umi_port and N x M umi_switch #155
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
aolofsson
commented
Aug 11, 2024
•
aolofsson
commented
- The current crossbar is awkward, an N:1 output mux with an arbiter and ready pushback is easier to use in some cases where we don't have a full N x N crossbar.
- Using new umi_port to create an N input by M output switch
- The crossbar is awkward, an N:1 output mux with an arbiter and ready pushback is easier to use - Can we replace umi_mux with this?
- Many fabrics are assymetric, so NXN is not natural. - Usig the new umi_port
aolofsson
changed the title
- Output is valid, so input should be valid as well for naming consistency
|
@azaidy I am merging this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.