Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: set precompiles after keeper creation #101

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

fbac
Copy link
Contributor

@fbac fbac commented Aug 19, 2024

Description

When creating an EVM Keeper with precompiles from the core Zeta node, it can be the case there are circular dependencies, such as:

  • Create evmkeeper with precompiles; one precompile requires the fungible keeper properly initialized.
  • Create the fungible keeper after evmkeeper, as fungible requires evm.

To solve this a function to set the precompiles is exposed:

  • Create EVM Keeper.
  • Create Fungible Keeper.
  • Set the precompiles with the updated dependencies.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new method to enhance contract management capabilities, allowing for the dynamic configuration of stateful precompiled contracts within the app's EVM context.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No bug fixes included in this release.
  • Documentation

    • Updated documentation to reflect the new method and its functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent changes introduce a new method to the Keeper struct in the EVM module, specifically the WithStatefulPrecompiledContracts method. This method enables the assignment of a slice of CustomContractFn functions to the customContractFns field, thereby enhancing the management of stateful precompiled contracts. The change expands the operational capabilities of the Keeper without disrupting existing functionalities.

Changes

Files Change Summary
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go Added WithStatefulPrecompiledContracts method to manage stateful precompiled contracts.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Keeper
    participant ContractManager

    User->>Keeper: WithStatefulPrecompiledContracts(contracts)
    Keeper->>ContractManager: Register custom contracts
    ContractManager->>Keeper: Acknowledge registration
    Keeper->>User: Confirmation of custom contracts setup
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@fbac fbac requested review from lumtis and skosito August 19, 2024 22:39
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.72%. Comparing base (5db67f1) to head (db86aba).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #101      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.73%   67.72%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         124      124              
  Lines       11452    11454       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         7757     7757              
- Misses       3254     3256       +2     
  Partials      441      441              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go 86.51% <0.00%> (-0.99%) ⬇️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43bf9dd and 89f9102.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (1)

418-420: Approved: Addition of WithStatefulPrecompiledContracts.

The method WithStatefulPrecompiledContracts correctly assigns the provided slice of CustomContractFn to the customContractFns field of the Keeper. This addition is clear and concise, enhancing the flexibility of the Keeper.

It is advisable to verify the usage of this method throughout the codebase to ensure it is integrated correctly and does not introduce circular dependencies or other issues.

x/evm/keeper/keeper.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fbac fbac requested a review from skosito September 1, 2024 17:54
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 89f9102 and db86aba.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +418 to +420
func (k *Keeper) WithStatefulPrecompiledContracts(contracts []CustomContractFn) {
k.customContractFns = contracts
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refactor the method for better readability and safety.

Consider applying the following refactors:

  1. Rename the method to SetStatefulPrecompiledContracts to clearly indicate that it's a setter method.
  2. Return the Keeper instance to allow method chaining, which can lead to more concise and readable code.
  3. Add a nil check for the contracts argument to prevent setting a nil slice and to improve the method's defensive programming.

Here's the updated method with the suggested changes:

func (k *Keeper) SetStatefulPrecompiledContracts(contracts []CustomContractFn) *Keeper {
    if contracts == nil {
        panic("contracts cannot be nil")
    }
    k.customContractFns = contracts
    return k
}

Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days-before-close if no further activity occurs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants