refactor: update to/from datename to isoformat compatible pattern #123
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dyf
requested changes
Jan 24, 2025
| f"^(?P<platform_abbreviation>.+?)_(?P<subject_id>.+?)_(?P<c_date>{RegexParts.DATE.value})_(?P<c_time>" | ||
| f"{RegexParts.TIME.value})$" | ||
| ) | ||
| DERIVED = ( | ||
| DERIVED_OLD = ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe move these to a DataRegexLegacy class and keep their old names?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates the
date_name_patterns.datetime_to_name_stringfunction to use the new patternYYYY-MM-DDTHHMMSS. It also deprecates thedatetime_from_name_stringfunction in favor of usingdatetime.fromisoformatIt also updates the data name to the pattern
<subject_id>_<datetime>instead of<label>_<date>_<time>