Fix markdown

docs/events/20241128/20241128.md

@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation'.
 
 Table 1: there are 9 variables, hence ((9*9)-9=) 72 tests being
 conducted. Using a alpha of 0.05 this means that one expects to find
-(0.05 * 72 = 3.6 =) 4 significant relations by chance.
+(0.05* 72 = 3.6 =) 4 significant relations by chance.
 It happened 24x that a p values was below 0.05,
 but the actual p values were not given.
 There is no correction for multiple testing.
@@ -142,11 +142,12 @@ p-values were not supplied, I asked at Nov 2nd.
 The paper cannot be found in Google Scholar?
 
 Figure 2 is quite deceiving. Please start you y axis at zero,
-else it shows you try to deceive.   
+else it shows you try to deceive.
 
 Variables used:
+
 - Seductive details
-- Pretraining knowledge: 
+- Pretraining knowledge:
 - Trainee reactions
 - Negative affect
 - Time on task
@@ -172,4 +173,4 @@ a small negative effect on some outcomes.
 - `[Stroebe, 2020]` Stroebe, W. (2020). Student Evaluations of Teaching
   Encourages Poor Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation: A Theoretical
   and Empirical Analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,
-  42(4), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1756817
+  42(4), 276–294. <https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1756817>