-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RHP4 spec changes #219
Merged
Merged
RHP4 spec changes #219
Changes from 16 commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f72797b
rhp4: implement rpc changes
n8maninger cd694ed
rhp4: update docstring
n8maninger 7cabe01
rhp4: fix lint
n8maninger aef0242
types,consensus: Add Capacity field to V2FileContract
lukechampine bed2bdc
types,consensus: Add Capacity field to V2FileContract
lukechampine f0d4bda
rhp4: use capacity field
n8maninger fd212fd
rhp4: validate sector indices
n8maninger dfdf69e
rhp4: validate duplicate indices
n8maninger 0b6c6fb
Merge pull request #220 from SiaFoundation/capacity
n8maninger 4715717
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into nate/rhp4-rpc-changes
n8maninger 8ee63c4
rhp4: return usage
n8maninger 094716d
rhp4: remove account funding cost
n8maninger 54b5123
rhp4: add usage to revise methods
n8maninger db1d712
rhp4: add usage to renew and refresh
n8maninger 0639228
rhp4: add usage to new contract
n8maninger fe2567f
rhp4: fix docstring
n8maninger 5672e6c
Update rhp/v4/validation.go
n8maninger 2652ab2
rhp4: RPC remove -> RPC free
n8maninger File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could it be that we are missing
fc.Filesize % SectorSize == 0
checks? Same for capacity?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SectorSize
is not a consensus concept, only an RHP one.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lukechampine what about
SegmentSize
?