-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BugFix] fix pk concurrent apply issue #51225
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sevev
force-pushed
the
fix_pk_concurrent_apply
branch
from
September 20, 2024 09:20
1277915
to
d9dd908
Compare
Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]>
sevev
force-pushed
the
fix_pk_concurrent_apply
branch
from
September 20, 2024 11:43
3056a28
to
58a205e
Compare
[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%) |
[FE Incremental Coverage Report]✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%) |
[BE Incremental Coverage Report]✅ pass : 4 / 4 (100.00%) file detail
|
wyb
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2024
decster
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2024
@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3 |
@Mergifyio backport branch-3.2 |
@Mergifyio backport branch-3.1 |
✅ Backports have been created
|
✅ Backports have been created
|
✅ Backports have been created
|
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 9dba8da)
42 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 9dba8da) # Conflicts: # be/src/storage/base_tablet.h
42 tasks
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2024
Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 9dba8da)
42 tasks
wanpengfei-git
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
Co-authored-by: zhangqiang <[email protected]>
wanpengfei-git
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
Co-authored-by: zhangqiang <[email protected]>
wanpengfei-git
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2024
Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: zhangqiang <[email protected]>
renzhimin7
pushed a commit
to renzhimin7/starrocks
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2024
Signed-off-by: sevev <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: zhiminr.ren <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why I'm doing:
If we drop tablet with flag
kKeepMetaAndFiles
, we will remove this tablet from memory directly. However, if the tablet is the primary key table, there might still be ongoing apply tasks. We should stop the background apply tasks before deleting it; otherwise, if a new tablet is created, there could be a scenario where apply tasks are executed simultaneously.e.g.
What I'm doing:
Stop running apply task first before remove the tablet from memory.
Fixes #issue
What type of PR is this:
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?
If yes, please specify the type of change:
Checklist:
Bugfix cherry-pick branch check: