Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement lazy join #1524
Implement lazy join #1524
Changes from 6 commits
f1a67d4
711c3a7
08be2d8
c9a5648
bc659c6
112a757
d091bba
f585987
8ecc821
190b8de
3bbc466
3e6561c
ec02b9f
cbc6252
f56a00b
1f54327
99ea8ee
1d5dcda
b2b944f
1b55f45
b9b7cae
0f4f859
62d9295
c7889a6
f1c886a
9e357cd
711212a
4b51d1d
8e85cc7
a8e3240
3f817fa
ad0128a
f88d4b8
66cb836
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We definitely have to talk about the
LocalVocab
stuff, as this really aggressively merges the local vocabs over and over again in the following cases:I see two potential angles here:
LocalVocab
class (the most aggressive way: Use a HashMap instead of a vector for theotherWordSets
.I will ask @hannahbast what she thinks about 1. It will only have a performance impact for inputs with very many nonempty local vocabs, and these are typically slower anyway, so it seems feasible to me.