-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove node stream polyfill #1407
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #1407 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 68.52% 87.84% +19.32%
============================================
Files 23 54 +31
Lines 1258 3077 +1819
Branches 40 40
============================================
+ Hits 862 2703 +1841
+ Misses 385 353 -32
- Partials 11 21 +10
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
aa6dee7
to
a3ab08c
Compare
@@ -34,9 +34,8 @@ | |||
"SDK" | |||
], | |||
"dependencies": { | |||
"@aeternity/aepp-calldata": "^1.1.0", | |||
"@aeternity/aepp-calldata": "github:aeternity/aepp-calldata-js#a623a44a259cc53e99b1e358ecc7b3f88edcb45c", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will there be a release with these changes included?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, I think so
a3ab08c
to
dbeae88
Compare
I'm planning to rename
TxBuildHelper.decode/encode
to something more general, but it is not ready yet.The need to switch from
bs58check
tobs58
is explained in aeternity/aepp-calldata-js#122.bip39 package can be configured to support different languages and this is not up to SDK to decide which of them should be included. Also, it depends on a set of unnecessary crypto libraries that is not easy to get rid of: bitcoinjs/bip39#170. It has a quite simple blockchain-agnostic interface. Our
@aeternity/bip39
didn't get updates in 3 years and probably shouldn't be used. So, I'm proposing to make the wallet developer usebip39
package by himself and remove it from sdk.