-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
replace usages of copy_arrays
with memmap
for asdf>=3.1.0
#230
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #230 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.90% 97.90%
=======================================
Files 54 54
Lines 2050 2055 +5
=======================================
+ Hits 2007 2012 +5
Misses 43 43 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Hmmm... the oldestdeps should have failed here since Line 21 in dab5b4d
It doesn't seem to even be running minimum_dependencies :-/ and is picking up asdf 3.3.0https://github.com/astropy/asdf-astropy/actions/runs/9993708226/job/27621947749?pr=230#step:10:24 @zacharyburnett what do you think we should do here? The usage is only in tests so run-time asdf-astropy doesn't need asdf>=3.1.0 but if we fix our oldest deps it will start failing (since it uses the runtime requirements). The tests would also fail for anyone who packages this repository using the run-time requirements to run tests (like the asdf issue that came up yesterday). We could update the tests to check the asdf version (and use either |
I think the only two options we have that maintain green status are
I'm inclined toward the latter. |
4edd2d9
to
d69eb02
Compare
copy_arrays
with memmap
copy_arrays
with memmap
for asdf>=3.1.0
@zacharyburnett would you rebase this to (hopefully) allow the oldestdeps to use the oldest versions (now that #232 is in). Also pre-commit is complaining of a |
add change log entry modify arguments
Co-authored-by: Brett Graham <[email protected]>
762ae35
to
25271bc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Oh, looks like we don't have branch protection rules 😮 Let's wait for the CI to go green before merging. |
follow-on to asdf-format/asdf#1797