Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

user/darkhttpd: new package #1460

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ttyyls
Copy link
Contributor

@ttyyls ttyyls commented Feb 20, 2024

No description provided.

@ttyyls ttyyls marked this pull request as draft April 19, 2024 21:11
@ttyyls ttyyls changed the title contrib/darkhttpd: new package (1.15) contrib/darkhttpd: new package (1.16) Jun 7, 2024
@ttyyls ttyyls closed this Jul 6, 2024
@ttyyls ttyyls reopened this Sep 6, 2024
@ttyyls ttyyls force-pushed the darkhttpd branch 3 times, most recently from b028700 to e1c9ac6 Compare September 6, 2024 10:51
@ttyyls ttyyls marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2024 10:52
@ttyyls ttyyls changed the title contrib/darkhttpd: new package (1.16) contrib/darkhttpd: new package Sep 6, 2024
@ttyyls ttyyls changed the title contrib/darkhttpd: new package user/darkhttpd: new package Oct 3, 2024
Comment on lines +13 to +18
# no tests defined
options = ["!check"]


def install(self):
self.install_license("COPYING")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

COPYING doesn't contain a copyright notice, so you can either e.g. import my patch from emikulic/darkhttpd#70 or probably do this instead:

Suggested change
# no tests defined
options = ["!check"]
def install(self):
self.install_license("COPYING")
# check: no tests defined
# distlicense: license file doesn't include copyright notice, see
# https://github.com/emikulic/darkhttpd/pull/70
options = ["!check", "!distlicense"]
def install(self):

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the patch itself looks good and I suppose necessary for the license to be coherent. But a copyight notice is included in the executable itself and gets displayed first when run, as such Im not sure if it's necessary to block on it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants