Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DT-1821-Updated the issuance schema and the request json to the latest #183

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

palatsangeetha
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@palatsangeetha palatsangeetha merged commit 3700867 into dev Oct 8, 2024
1 check passed
@palatsangeetha palatsangeetha deleted the DT-1821-Update_eblissuance_schema branch October 8, 2024 09:27
{
"partyCode": "ISSUE_TO_PARTY_CODE_PLACEHOLDER",
"codeListProvider": "EPUI",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@palatsangeetha: The EPUI code is no longer valid for this field. I am a bit surprised that the CTK is giving green for this. I suspect one of the eBL conditional validations are not up to date (the same code is used for eBL, ISS, and PINT, so the bug is in all the standards).

@gj0dcsa: FYI in case you were planning to deploy it and someone test.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@palatsangeetha: The EPUI code is no longer valid for this field. I am a bit surprised that the CTK is giving green for this. I suspect one of the eBL conditional validations are not up to date (the same code is used for eBL, ISS, and PINT, so the bug is in all the standards).

@gj0dcsa: FYI in case you were planning to deploy it and someone test.

Thanks @nt-gt for pointing this out. I will update the request with example values from the latest API spec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants