-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add exist method on BlobStoreRepository #312
Merged
+90
−6
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
26 changes: 26 additions & 0 deletions
26
...c/test/java/org/rutebanken/helper/storage/repository/InMemoryBlobStoreRepositoryTest.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ | ||
package org.rutebanken.helper.storage.repository; | ||
|
||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
|
||
import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream; | ||
import java.io.IOException; | ||
import java.io.InputStream; | ||
import java.util.HashMap; | ||
|
||
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*; | ||
class InMemoryBlobStoreRepositoryTest { | ||
|
||
public static final String BLOB_NAME = "blobName"; | ||
public static final byte[] BLOB_CONTENT = "content".getBytes(); | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
void testUploadExistAndGet() throws IOException { | ||
InMemoryBlobStoreRepository repository = new InMemoryBlobStoreRepository(new HashMap<>()); | ||
repository.uploadBlob(BLOB_NAME, new ByteArrayInputStream(BLOB_CONTENT)); | ||
assertTrue(repository.exist(BLOB_NAME)); | ||
InputStream blob = repository.getBlob(BLOB_NAME); | ||
assertNotNull(blob); | ||
assertArrayEquals(BLOB_CONTENT, blob.readAllBytes()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
31 changes: 31 additions & 0 deletions
31
.../test/java/org/rutebanken/helper/storage/repository/LocalDiskBlobStoreRepositoryTest.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | ||
package org.rutebanken.helper.storage.repository; | ||
|
||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.io.TempDir; | ||
|
||
import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream; | ||
import java.io.File; | ||
import java.io.IOException; | ||
import java.io.InputStream; | ||
|
||
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*; | ||
|
||
class LocalDiskBlobStoreRepositoryTest { | ||
|
||
public static final String BLOB_NAME = "blobName"; | ||
public static final byte[] BLOB_CONTENT = "content".getBytes(); | ||
|
||
@TempDir | ||
File tempDirectory; | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
void testUploadExistAndGet() throws IOException { | ||
LocalDiskBlobStoreRepository repository = new LocalDiskBlobStoreRepository(tempDirectory.getAbsolutePath()); | ||
repository.uploadBlob(BLOB_NAME, new ByteArrayInputStream(BLOB_CONTENT)); | ||
assertTrue(repository.exist(BLOB_NAME)); | ||
InputStream blob = repository.getBlob(BLOB_NAME); | ||
assertNotNull(blob); | ||
assertArrayEquals(BLOB_CONTENT, blob.readAllBytes()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine to me 👍 This is a bit of a wart in AWS S3 client - using exceptions for flow control, that is - so handling it like this is fine.
Of course returning an
Optional<InputStream>
could express the semantics of the return value better, but the current implementation and the other changes in the PR are less intrusive and won't cause issues downstream, so I'm fine with this.