Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Iris
: Enable Iris for exercises based on their categories #9461base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Iris
: Enable Iris for exercises based on their categories #9461Changes from 2 commits
171b684
9a2dc2c
6812ddb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider organizing imports.
The new imports for
SortedSet
andTreeSet
are added at the beginning of the import block. While this doesn't affect functionality, it's generally a good practice to group imports by their packages.Consider reorganizing the imports as follows:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider removing default initialization or
@Nullable
annotation.The
enabledForCategories
field is annotated with@Nullable
, but it's also initialized with a newTreeSet
. This could lead to confusion as the field will never be null unless explicitly set to null.Consider one of the following options:
@Nullable
annotation if the field should never be null.If you choose option 1, update the field declaration as follows:
If you choose option 2, update the field declaration as follows:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider returning an unmodifiable view of the set.
The current implementation returns the
enabledForCategories
set directly, which could allow external code to modify the internal state of the object. To maintain encapsulation and prevent unintended modifications, consider returning an unmodifiable view of the set.Update the getter method as follows:
Don't forget to add the following import:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Create a defensive copy in the setter method.
The current implementation directly assigns the input set to the field. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the caller retains a reference to the set and modifies it after calling this method. To prevent this, consider creating a defensive copy of the input set.
Update the setter method as follows:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment for the new field.
The addition of the
enabledForCategories
field is well-implemented and consistent with the existing code structure. It adheres to the coding guidelines, including proper naming conventions and the use of Java records for DTOs.Consider adding a brief comment above the record declaration to explain the purpose of the
enabledForCategories
field. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. For example: