Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify design formula and blind dispersion estimation #1367

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

pmoris
Copy link
Contributor

@pmoris pmoris commented Aug 29, 2024

I think it could be useful to explicitly mention what the design formula ~1 is doing (= specifying an intercept-only model) and how this relates to the dispersion estimation that happens during the variance stabilizing transformation (= the default argument of both rlog and vst is blind=TRUE, which does the same thing as setting an intercept-only model).

Source: https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#blind-dispersion-estimation

This tripped me up a bit as I was exploring the code, although in hindsight it makes perfect sense: it is mentioned explicitly in several places that the rnaseq pipeline does not take into account any sample metadata, so ~1 is the only possible design to use, and the deseq2 docs clearly recommend using blind=T (the default) for exploratory quality control plots.

Since blind=TRUE is the default, I guess specifying it in the code is a bit redundant, but personally I like explicit code more than implicit.

Cheers!

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/rnaseq branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint). => lint test keeps failing locally on files_unchanged: docs/images/nf-core-rnaseq_logo_dark.png does not match the template
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 29, 2024

nf-core lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 760e83f

+| ✅ 173 tests passed       |+
#| ❔   9 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗   7 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • files_exist - File not found: assets/multiqc_config.yml
  • files_exist - File not found: .github/workflows/awstest.yml
  • files_exist - File not found: .github/workflows/awsfulltest.yml
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in methods_description_template.yml: #Update the HTML below to your preferred methods description, e.g. add publication citation for this pipeline
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add in-text citation tools to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add bibliographic entries to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Only uncomment below if logic in toolCitationText/toolBibliographyText has been filled!

❔ Tests ignored:

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 2.14.1
  • Run at 2024-09-03 14:32:34

Copy link
Member

@pinin4fjords pinin4fjords left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree with everything except restating defaults in the function calls.

bin/deseq2_qc.r Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
bin/deseq2_qc.r Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pinin4fjords pinin4fjords merged commit 1190e6c into nf-core:dev Sep 3, 2024
24 checks passed
@pinin4fjords pinin4fjords added this to the 3.15.0 milestone Sep 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants