-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to v0.15.4 #468
Update to v0.15.4 #468
Changes from 1 commit
0447d1b
fdee091
58a01a5
ad536a8
17efd61
6bbb357
f9b5fb1
2ac05d4
dcfc61b
484ba90
7fe4f15
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ clearCache pkgName version = do | |
eachRouteDir | ||
[ PackageVersionR pkgName' (PathVersion version) | ||
, PackageAvailableVersionsR pkgName' | ||
, PackageBadgeR pkgName' | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Should this be readded? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. uh yes There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Fixed |
||
] | ||
removeDirectoryRecursive | ||
|
||
|
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not actually sure we can drop badge support altogether. If I recall correctly, most of the packages within core make use of this for their READMEs. If we need to fork
barrier
to work with 9.2.3 then I could probably pick up that task.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like it just needs its upper bound updated: purefunctor/barrier@79e8fc3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cool, yeah that sounds doable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like Phil did the same thing a few years ago: philopon/barrier#4
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok I guess we can try open a PR and see if we get a response
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added it to extra-deps, but I can't get it to build.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking into it...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I think I need to relax the bounds for
bytestring
inbarrier
: purefunctor/barrier@db5e27cThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks to @i-am-the-slime I got the stack build working as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@purefunctor if you move it to
purescript-contrib
I can update the dependencies. Apart fromt his I think it is good to go now