-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Generalized proofs of [RS17, Cor. 5.6] #147
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
It might be worth pointing out, that if this is implemented then beyond just for Segal spaces, this can also directly be applied to 2-Segal spaces, rather than having to crudely copy paste code. |
Also note that a relative version of this statement already exists in |
@thchatzidiamantis I'm sorry this has languished for so long. It's been a busy teaching semester. I started to look at this today and couldn't find the term |
The proof that function types into a fiberwise Segal family are Segal can me made to say that dependent function types where the family is local with respect to a shape inclusion are themselves local with respect to the same shape inclusion.