Fix testutils invoke with incorrect arg count #1336
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This fix is extracted from #1327 by @dmkozh. Co-authored-by: Dmytro Kozhevin <[email protected]>
dmkozh
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2024
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2024
### What Change two locations of the soroban-sdk-macros which were gated on the contract crates `testutils` feature, to be gated on the SDK's `testutils` feature. ### Why Recently I introduced a bug into the sdk across two changes: - #1344 - #1336 The bug was that I changed how some code was gated to be gated on whether the contract's `testutils` feature was enabled, rather than on the SDKs. Sometime ago in the following issue I changed how all of a contract's testutils are enabled/disabled, by being enabled/disabled by the SDK's testutils feature: - #1301 That change was good, it fixed a horrid issue with testing contracts where you could have some contracts in testutils mode, and others not, leading to strange errors when importing native contracts for testing. However, when I worked on the two issues above, I inadvertently forgot that we had changed the structure of how testutils code got enabled, and I introduced across those two PRs two new locations where we followed the old pattern and gated on the contract feature set, not the SDKs. For most users this will have presented no issues because there all of these testutilities are always enabled in a contract's own tests. This masked the issue in all of our own tests, but broke setups like fuzzing where the contract gets imported. All of our fuzz projects unfortunately don't currently build the fuzz components, and so this got missed until someone (me) tried to use them. ### Known limitations This change doesn't introduce a test to detect this type of breakage. I think the way we can detect this in the future is have our pre-existing test vector build as part of CI. This issue is tracking that follow up work: - #1363 ### Merging This fix is targeting main, but we need a similar fix to target v21, because part of this bug was introduced into v21.7.2. Once this change merges to main, I will partially cherry-pick it into a backport patch release.
leighmcculloch
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2024
### What Change two locations of the soroban-sdk-macros which were gated on the contract crates `testutils` feature, to be gated on the SDK's `testutils` feature. ### Why Recently I introduced a bug into the sdk across two changes: - #1344 - #1336 The bug was that I changed how some code was gated to be gated on whether the contract's `testutils` feature was enabled, rather than on the SDKs. Sometime ago in the following issue I changed how all of a contract's testutils are enabled/disabled, by being enabled/disabled by the SDK's testutils feature: - #1301 That change was good, it fixed a horrid issue with testing contracts where you could have some contracts in testutils mode, and others not, leading to strange errors when importing native contracts for testing. However, when I worked on the two issues above, I inadvertently forgot that we had changed the structure of how testutils code got enabled, and I introduced across those two PRs two new locations where we followed the old pattern and gated on the contract feature set, not the SDKs. For most users this will have presented no issues because there all of these testutilities are always enabled in a contract's own tests. This masked the issue in all of our own tests, but broke setups like fuzzing where the contract gets imported. All of our fuzz projects unfortunately don't currently build the fuzz components, and so this got missed until someone (me) tried to use them. ### Known limitations This change doesn't introduce a test to detect this type of breakage. I think the way we can detect this in the future is have our pre-existing test vector build as part of CI. This issue is tracking that follow up work: - #1363 ### Merging This fix is targeting main, but we need a similar fix to target v21, because part of this bug was introduced into v21.7.2. Once this change merges to main, I will partially cherry-pick it into a backport patch release. (cherry picked from commit 1eaa5d8)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Panic if the number of args being passed to a natively registered contract don't match the number of args the contract function expects.
Why
This bug exists only in the testutils path of invoking a natively registered contract and does not impact WASM registered contracts, or the env as deployed.
If a native contract is invoked with too few arguments, a panic occurs with an index out of bounds errors that is not intuitive to debug. The panic displayed to the developer should be as intuitive as possible.
index out of bounds: the len is 1 but the index is 1invalid number of input arguments: 2 expected, got 1If a native contract is invoked with too many arguments, no panic occurs, the additional arguments are simply ignored. The behaviour of invoking natively registered contracts in testutils should be as consistent as possible to invoking contracts on a deployed network. In both of these cases the invoke fails.
invalid number of input arguments: 2 expected, got 3Thanks to @dmkozh who fixed this bug and proposed the better error experience in #1327 which is destined for the next major release of the sdk v22, and this pull request extracts the fix in isolation so we can release a bug fix release of the sdk v21.