-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Boron removal unit test harness #1415
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1415 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 94.01% 94.00% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 335 335
Lines 35572 35572
==========================================
- Hits 33444 33440 -4
- Misses 2128 2132 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
# Start test class | ||
class TestBoronRemoval_GenPropPack: | ||
@pytest.fixture(scope="class") | ||
def gen_boron_removal_model(self): | ||
m = ConcreteModel() | ||
m.fs = FlowsheetBlock(dynamic=False) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless I missed it, this gen prop pack test is missing from the update version. Is there a reason this test should be left out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had left it out initially because it had seemed redundant to test the unit model with more than 1 property model (and using a property model outside of watertap). However, if this is an important aspect for testing, I can add on these tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it can be left out. I just wanted to make sure you had deleted it intentionally rather than accidentally leaving it out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Fixes/Resolves:
#1302
Changes proposed in this PR:
Legal Acknowledgement
By contributing to this software project, I agree to the following terms and conditions for my contribution: