-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gui installer: append derivation path to xpubs #581
gui installer: append derivation path to xpubs #581
Conversation
4c5653a
to
cdbe1b9
Compare
ef6c486
to
e381a7a
Compare
I found a bug in signing a recovery transaction. I shared a screencast in private. Here is the descriptor.
And here is the mnemonic
And here is the PSBT
|
Opened #584 to fix my bug. |
41aebcf
to
a43a92d
Compare
Merged #599, this can now be rebased. |
faddc99
to
d71be89
Compare
d71be89
to
30ce2de
Compare
I assume this is ready for testing? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 30ce2de -- tested it locally and reviewed the descriptor analysis related changes. Edouard also tested it against a setup with a Specter device.
The policy registration on the Ledger is so much cleaner.
Just a few display quirks that i think we can workaround in the future. We could regroup the "number of signatures needed" per signing device in the future so that it doesn't show "4 signatures needed from X and Y". Or "0/4" when only 2 signing devices are used. Here is what i'm talking about:
self.edit_name = false; | ||
} else { | ||
self.edit_name = true; | ||
self.form_name.value = String::new(); | ||
} | ||
self.form_xpub.valid = true; | ||
self.form_xpub.valid = check_key_network(&key, self.network); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't this be fixing #337 by any chance?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes you are right !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested and i indeed can't import a testnet descriptor to mainnet anymore. Updating the OP before merging.
EDIT (by Antoine): this also fixes #337.