Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename the factory methods to DecoratorAssetsDefinitionBuilder. #22400

Merged

Conversation

schrockn
Copy link
Member

@schrockn schrockn commented Jun 9, 2024

Summary & Motivation

I thought these methods would more natural, but there is decorator-specific logic that will live on for awhile, so just being explicit about it.

Once in these methods then we can work on unifying the logic, but moving the asset check stuff to use these existing factory methods is just changing too much at the same time.

How I Tested These Changes

BK

Copy link
Member Author

schrockn commented Jun 9, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @schrockn and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@schrockn schrockn force-pushed the rename-DecoratorAssetsDefinitionBuilder-factory-methods branch 2 times, most recently from 87523e7 to c0ccd1a Compare June 9, 2024 17:05
@schrockn schrockn changed the base branch from typed-is-list to is-iterable June 9, 2024 17:05
@schrockn schrockn force-pushed the rename-DecoratorAssetsDefinitionBuilder-factory-methods branch from c0ccd1a to a4acbde Compare June 9, 2024 17:06
@schrockn schrockn force-pushed the rename-DecoratorAssetsDefinitionBuilder-factory-methods branch from a4acbde to 213e19b Compare June 9, 2024 17:14
@schrockn schrockn force-pushed the rename-DecoratorAssetsDefinitionBuilder-factory-methods branch from 213e19b to c796b75 Compare June 9, 2024 17:15
@schrockn schrockn force-pushed the rename-DecoratorAssetsDefinitionBuilder-factory-methods branch from c796b75 to 297e3ec Compare June 9, 2024 18:10
@schrockn schrockn changed the base branch from is-iterable to type-test-asset-check-decorator-with-check-specs June 9, 2024 18:10
@schrockn schrockn force-pushed the type-test-asset-check-decorator-with-check-specs branch from 2027172 to ba07d57 Compare June 9, 2024 18:25
@schrockn schrockn force-pushed the rename-DecoratorAssetsDefinitionBuilder-factory-methods branch from 297e3ec to 9d2e085 Compare June 9, 2024 18:26
@schrockn schrockn marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2024 18:28
@schrockn schrockn requested review from smackesey and sryza June 9, 2024 18:28
Copy link
Member Author

schrockn commented Jun 12, 2024

Merge activity

  • Jun 12, 10:06 AM EDT: @schrockn started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
  • Jun 12, 10:20 AM EDT: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
  • Jun 12, 10:21 AM EDT: @schrockn merged this pull request with Graphite.

@schrockn schrockn force-pushed the type-test-asset-check-decorator-with-check-specs branch from 7d1708a to 976f870 Compare June 12, 2024 14:17
Base automatically changed from type-test-asset-check-decorator-with-check-specs to master June 12, 2024 14:19
@schrockn schrockn force-pushed the rename-DecoratorAssetsDefinitionBuilder-factory-methods branch from cbecf65 to 3eb8f75 Compare June 12, 2024 14:19
@schrockn schrockn merged commit 8a8a622 into master Jun 12, 2024
1 check was pending
@schrockn schrockn deleted the rename-DecoratorAssetsDefinitionBuilder-factory-methods branch June 12, 2024 14:21
cmpadden pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
## Summary & Motivation

I thought these methods would more natural, but there is decorator-specific logic that will live on for awhile, so just being explicit about it.

Once in these methods then we can work on unifying the logic, but moving the asset check stuff to use these existing factory methods is just changing too much at the same time.

## How I Tested These Changes

BK
danielgafni pushed a commit to danielgafni/dagster that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2024
…ter-io#22400)

## Summary & Motivation

I thought these methods would more natural, but there is decorator-specific logic that will live on for awhile, so just being explicit about it.

Once in these methods then we can work on unifying the logic, but moving the asset check stuff to use these existing factory methods is just changing too much at the same time.

## How I Tested These Changes

BK
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants