-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 366
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix observed variable detection #1805
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 90.65% // Head: 90.43% // Decreases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1805 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.65% 90.43% -0.23%
==========================================
Files 138 123 -15
Lines 10918 10283 -635
==========================================
- Hits 9898 9299 -599
+ Misses 1020 984 -36
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the status of this @vitkl ?
Still a work in progress, unfortunately, the solution I added doesn't seem to exclude observed variables. I will do a deeper dive some time this year. |
I think this should be addressable by removing different procedures for different AutoGuide classes (#2695). |
Create a separate method to detect observed sites and apply it everywhere necessary to automatically exclude observed sites.
Fixes #1801