Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for Improving status in CAPI resources #11105

Open
46 of 98 tasks
fabriziopandini opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #11422 · May be fixed by #11428
Open
46 of 98 tasks

Tracking issue for Improving status in CAPI resources #11105

fabriziopandini opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #11422 · May be fixed by #11428
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Comments

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

fabriziopandini commented Aug 27, 2024

This is a tracking issue for activities related to #10897

Enablement

Activities that are required to unblock implementation

Documentation updates

Implementation Phase1

Focus on phase 1 of the implementation, where new field are added but not yet used by controllers

Follow up / before release

Activities that could be deferred to after we get a first version of this proposal implemented

Implementation Phase2

Initial notes for phase 2 of the implementation, where new field are added but not yet used by controllers

  • ...
  • API modeling
  • Change contracts
    • ...
  • Use new fields
    • MachineHealthCheck controller
      • Change test for ControlPlaneInitializedCondition in reconcile
      • Get MachineHealthCheckSucceededCondition in patchUnhealthyTargets
      • Drop failureReson/failureMessage test from needsRemediation
      • Change test for ControlPlaneInitializedCondition, InfrastructureReadyCondition in needsRemediation (few places)
    • KCP controller
      • Change test for MachineEtcdMemberHealthyCondition in canSafelyRemoveEtcdMember + add a test for ClusterHealthy if not already there
      • We should use the Initialized condition instead of the Available condition to calculate remoteConditionsGracePeriod
  • Condition utils
    • Rename packages for condition utils (conditions-->deprecated conditions, v1beta2conditions --> conditions)
  • Clusterctl
    • clusterctl describe (drop v1beta2 flag, introduce deprecated flag, switch default behaviour in the implementation)

Implementation Phase3

  • ...

Backlog / unprioritized

  • Scale testing with CAPD (check for condition flakiness)
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-priority Indicates an issue lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 27, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Feel free to assign me to "Improve Cluster Cache Tracker to allow tracking of connection problems"

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. labels Aug 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed needs-priority Indicates an issue lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Aug 27, 2024
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini changed the title [WIP] Tracking issue for Improving status in CAPI resources Tracking issue for Improving status in CAPI resources Sep 26, 2024
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini added the triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. label Sep 26, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Sep 26, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Nov 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sbueringer: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
4 participants