-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
Meeting 2021 09 09
Thomas Naughton edited this page Sep 9, 2021
·
4 revisions
- Next Meetings and Deadlines
- PMIx ASC Monthly Meeting: Thursday, Sept. 9
- PMIx ASC Officer Nominations Due: Tuesday, Sept. 21
- 2022-2024 Co-Chair
- 2022-2024 Secretary
- PMIx ASC 4Q Agenda Items Due: Tuesday, Sept. 28
- PMIx ASC 4Q Agenda Freeze: Tuesday, Oct. 12
- PMIx ASC 2022 Dates: Tuesday, Oct. 12
- PMIx ASC 4Q Meeting: Tuesday, Oct. 26 & Thursday, Oct. 28 ASC 4Q 2021 Meeting
- PMIx v4 Release Update (Ralph/Josh)
- Planning to release v4.1 soon
- PMIx v5 Release Update (Ken/Dave)
- Working Group Updates:
- Slicing/Grouping of functionality: Stephen Herbein
- Implementation agnostic document: Dave Solt
- Tools: Isaías A. Comprés
- Dynamic workflows: --
- PMIx Standard: Open GitHub Issues and PRs
- PMIx Governance: Open GitHub Issues and PRs
Josh Hursey (IBM)
Thomas Naughton (ORNL)
Stephen Herbein (LLNL)
Michael Karo (Altair)
Isaias Compres (TUM)pres (TUM)
John Delsignore (TotalView)
- Review Next Meetings and Deadlines
- PMIx ASC Monthly Meeting: Thursday, Sept. 9
- PMIx ASC Officer Nominations Due: Tuesday, Sept. 21
- 2022-2024 Co-Chair
- 2022-2024 Secretary
- PMIx ASC 4Q Agenda Items Due: Tuesday, Sept. 28
- PMIx ASC 4Q Agenda Freeze: Tuesday, Oct. 12
- PMIx ASC 2022 Dates: Tuesday, Oct. 12
- PMIx v4 Release Update
- PMIx v4.1:
- PMIx v5 Release Update
- WG: Slicing/Grouping of functionality
- #357: Cross-version support added for review
- StephenH starting new position, will be stepping down from WG lead. Looking for new lead if interested, otherwise will be putting WG on hold.
- Will send announcement to list.
- WG: Implementation agnostic document
- Point raised if right fit for interoperability between implementations, or is Tools WG better fit?
- Suggestion to bring to Dave (this WG) and discuss in next mtg to get feedback.
- WG: Tools
- Forming phase done
- Collaborators from the USA and Europe at the moment
- Identified goals for the WG:
- Dlopen friendly headers and specific return values
- Check issues below
- John and Ralph are leading this
- Seems to belong in the implementation agnostic WG
- General purpose transaction API
- Use cases: exchange of resources
- Prototypes will be part of a few european research projects
- Heterogeneous resource representation improvements
- May overlap with slicing WG
- Dlopen friendly headers and specific return values
- Discussion: Note regarding dlopen, the OMPD work for generating header that could be helpful to verify correctness of header content
- Forming phase done
- WG: Dynamic workflows
- Justing Wozniak from Argonne volunteered to lead. See mailing list for updates.
- Open Tickets: